Case Study  ·  Marketing Automation

Automated Flows Outperform Blasts 62% Revenue Share

A 2-location NYC dispensary proves automated flows generate 62% of strictly-attributed revenue versus 38% from manual blasts. $16.9K in flow revenue runs with zero ongoing staff labor.

AutomationFlows vs BlastsEmail & SMSNYC

Flow Revenue vs. Blast Revenue

62%Flow Revenue Share
$16.9KFlow Revenue
$10.4KBlast Revenue
488Conversions
The Challenge

The dispensary was spending significant staff time on manual blast campaigns while automated flows sat underutilized. Both Manhattan locations had basic flows configured but never optimized. The question: could properly built and maintained flows actually outperform the manual work that consumed hours of staff time each week?

Results at a Glance
Total Strict Revenue

$27,363

Combined flows + blasts, June 2026

Flow Revenue

$16,923

62% of total, zero ongoing labor

Blast Revenue

$10,440

38% of total, manual staff effort

Total Conversions

488

Across all channels

Flow Share

62%

Automation outperforms manual

Locations

2

Two Manhattan locations

Strict attribution via Alpine IQ: only revenue from recipients who engaged with the campaign is counted.

What We Did

How we did it.

    Flow Audit

    Evaluated existing automated sequences and identified gaps in the customer lifecycle. Found that welcome flows were triggering but underperforming, post-purchase flows were missing entirely, and winback sequences had never been configured.

    Rebuild Core Flows

    Reconstructed welcome, post-purchase, browse abandonment, and winback sequences with strict attribution tracking. Each flow was built with location-aware content for each store's customers, reflecting neighborhood product preferences.

    Blast Optimization

    Did not abandon blasts but refined frequency and targeting to avoid cannibalizing flow conversions. Blasts shifted to promotional announcements, new product drops, and event-driven content that automated flows cannot handle.

    Attribution Comparison

    Ran strict attribution side-by-side for 30 days to compare flow vs. blast performance. The 62/38 split emerged clearly and consistently, proving that automation is the primary revenue engine when properly built.

    Key Takeaways

    Gold Standard Solutions manages marketing automation for a 2-location Manhattan dispensary group, where automated flows generated $16,923 (62% of total) versus $10,440 (38%) from manual blasts under strict attribution in June 2026. The total strictly-attributed revenue was $27,363 with 488 conversions. Flow revenue included welcome sequences, post-purchase follow-ups, browse abandonment triggers, and winback campaigns tracked through the Alpine IQ platform.

    Want Results Like This?

    We build and manage automated marketing flows for dispensaries across NY, NJ, and PA.